Technology Is Picking Up Ghosts Underwater: Thousands of Strange Objects Near US Coasts

 

Technology Is Picking Up Ghosts Underwater: Thousands of Strange Objects Near US Coasts








What’s Being Logged and Why People Are Talking

There’s been a flurry of reports thousands, according to one popular tracking app that point to mysterious objects not just in the sky but beneath, and skimming across, U.S. waterways. Enigma, a crowd sourced database that bills itself as the most queryable historical record for global UFO/UAP reports, says it’s collected tens of thousands of entries since 2022. A big slice of those are sightings close to shorelines: hundreds within five to ten miles of the coast, and more than 150 specifically describing objects appearing to enter or exit the water without a visible splash. That image an object vanishing into the sea as if into thin air has a way of grabbing attention.

Numbers That Trigger Alarm Bells

When a whitepaper claims thousands of sightings, it’s reasonable to squint a bit. Enigma’s headline figure over 30,000 reports sounds dramatic, and the roughly 9,000 within 10 miles of U.S. waterways is what reporters are zeroing in on. California and Florida top the state lists, which makes intuitive sense: lots of coast, lots of people, lots of boats and beaches where a blinking light will be seen and recorded. Still, raw counts are only the start. How many are high quality sensor captures? How many come from trained observers versus civilian cellphone videos shot from a moving car at night? Those distinctions matter when a navy admiral or national security official reads the data.

What Witnesses Describe (And What That Could Mean)

Reports included videos of inexplicable green glows under the surface and accounts of objects that seemed to pass into water without making a splash. If you’ve ever watched someone drop a heavy backpack into a swimming pool, you know what a splash looks like. So claims of “no splash” invite two immediate possibilities: either the observer missed the transient splash because of distance or angle, or the phenomenon really is behaving unlike anything we understand from conventional hydrodynamics. The former happens a lot poor angles, bad lighting, and distance create optical illusions. The latter, if verified, would be extraordinary and would demand explanation.

Voices on Both Sides: Skeptics and Believers





Commentators run the gamut. Some writers, and certain podcasters, lean hard into the idea that we’re witnessing technology beyond our understanding perhaps even non human tech. Others are more skeptical. Kent Heckenlively, for example, framed it bluntly: either it’s something unknown or “our technology is picking up ghosts underwater.” That’s a provocative line exactly the kind of sound bite that spreads on social feeds but it’s also a bit flippant. A more measured stance is to say: we have an unusual dataset that contains both noise and possible signal; the task is to separate the two.

Why the Navy Is Paying Attention

It’s not just UFO hobbyists who care. Retired Navy Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet issued warnings that objects capable of entering water without observable splash or otherwise showing “unexplainable characteristics” should trigger a red flag for defense agencies. Consider the strategic implications: coastal defense, submarine operations, port security, and even civilian shipping could be affected if there were craft capable of moving between air and sea in ways we don’t expect. That’s why a handful of flagged reports can escalate into official concern, even if most reports turn out to be misidentifications.

The Problem with Crowd Sourced Data




Crowd sourced databases are invaluable for spotting patterns at scale. They’re also messy. People upload videos, eyewitness accounts, screenshots from social media, and occasionally prank entries. The data’s democratic nature means you get everything from serious sonar logs to blurry handheld footage. If you imagine a potluck where everyone brings a dish labeled “mystery casserole,” you’ll get the idea: there’s interesting stuff in there, but you also need someone with a spoon and a discerning palate to sort the edible from the inedible.

Reasonable Explanations to Consider

Before concluding we’ve found alien submarines, it’s worth remembering the many mundane explanations that can masquerade as anomalies. Bioluminescent organisms, optical refraction on waves, underwater drones, military training exercises, even atmospheric mirages all can look strange, especially to an untrained eye. For instance, a remote operated vehicle briefly breaking the surface at night and reflecting sunlight could be mistaken for a greenish glow. Likewise, naval sonar returns sometimes produce echoes that read as solid objects to automated logging systems but are actually complex interference patterns.

What Would Convince Scientists and the Military?


High quality, corroborated evidence: multiple sensors (optical, radar, sonar) recording the same event from different angles, preferably with metadata intact. A video clip on its own is rarely definitive unless it’s backed by radar tracks, sonar pings, or instrument logs from a reliable platform. That’s why governments tend to treat large scale, multi sensor anomalies differently from isolated cellphone captures.

What Happens Next (Hint: More Science, Less Clickbait)

The path forward is boring, but promising: rigorous triage of reports, deployment of trained sensor platforms in hotspots, and careful sharing of verified anomalies with the scientific community. If certain locales consistently generate unexplained multi sensor events, researchers will study those areas more closely. If not, we’ll likely classify most of this as noise amplified by modern connectivity. Either way, the conversation is useful: it nudges agencies to modernize data collection and pushes scientists to think about how complex systems air, sea, and human perception interact.

A Final Note of Humility

We should be cautious about grand narratives. Enthusiastic claims of “ghosts underwater” sell headlines, but they don’t do us any favors intellectually. On the other hand, dismissing every sighting out of hand would be just as irresponsible. The sensible middle path is to treat the Enigma database as a starting point: a map of curiosity that flags where we need better instruments and clearer eyes. After all, history shows that many once mysterious phenomena become ordinary once we have the right tools. But sometimes, rarely, a persistent anomaly forces a genuine rewrite of what we thought we knew. We don’t know yet which of those two outcomes this will be.


Open Your Mind !!!

Source: DailyCller

Comments

Post a Comment

Trending 🔥

Google’s Veo 3 AI Video Tool Is Redefining Reality — And The World Isn’t Ready

Image
Google’s Veo 3 AI Video Tool Is Redefining Reality — And The World Isn’t Ready In May 2025, Google unveiled Veo 3, its latest AI-powered video generation model, at the Google I/O event. This groundbreaking tool has rapidly transformed the landscape of digital content creation, enabling users to produce hyper-realistic videos complete with synchronized audio, dialogue, and sound effects—all from simple text or image prompts. As Veo 3 garners attention for its impressive capabilities, it also raises significant questions about the future of media authenticity, creative professions, and the ethical implications of AI-generated content. What Sets Veo 3 Apart? Veo 3 represents a significant leap forward in AI video generation technology. Unlike its predecessors and competitors, Veo 3 offers: Native Audio Integration: Veo 3 can generate synchronized audio, including dialogues, ambient sounds, and music, enhancing the realism of the videos.  High-Quality Visuals: The model produces vi...
Read more

Tiny Machines, Huge Impact: Molecular Jackhammers Wipe Out Cancer Cells

Image
  Tiny Machines, Huge Impact: Molecular Jackhammers Wipe Out Cancer Cells 1. A Revolutionary Cancer-Killing Tool Scientists from Rice University, Texas A&M, and the University of Texas MD Anderson have invented a radical tool that destroys 99% of cancer cells —without using drugs, radiation, or heat. Instead, it uses special dye molecules and gently applied light to physically rip cancer cells apart from the inside. This technique—nicknamed “molecular jackhammers” —has achieved astonishing results in lab cultures and animal studies. These molecular jackhammers are based on a familiar dye used in hospitals: aminocyanine . When exposed to near-infrared light , this dye vibrates at incredibly high frequencies—up to 1 trillion times per second. These vibrations break open cancer cell membranes, causing cells to collapse. Published in the journal Nature Chemistry , this discovery offers a new frontier in cancer treatment by physically destroying tumor cells rather than pois...
Read more

A New Kind of Life: Scientists Push the Boundaries of Genetics

Image
A New Kind of Life: Scientists Push the Boundaries of Genetics The strange idea of making life “better” It almost sounds like science fiction: a team of researchers in Cambridge claims they’ve created a form of life that’s leaner, more efficient, maybe even “more perfect” than anything nature has ever managed. That phrase more perfect is tricky, of course, because perfection in biology is a moving target. What works in one environment is useless in another. Still, the claim is bold. The scientists didn’t just tweak a gene here or there, like swapping out corn DNA to make it more pestresistant. They rewrote the actual structure of life’s code, stripping it down, removing what they saw as excess baggage. The result is something they call Syn57 : a genetically engineered strain of E. coli. Yes, the same bacterium you’ve probably heard about from grim foodsafety warnings. Only this version isn’t lurking on a questionable hot dogit’s a reimagined lifeform built line by line from altere...
Read more