AI’s Third Phase: When Agents Start Doing More Than Just Helping
AI’s Third Phase: When Agents Start Doing More Than Just Helping
Chatbots, Assistants, and Now... Agents?
Then came assistants also called copilots like Microsoft’s Copilot or Google’s Gemini. These weren’t just chatty anymore; they could help draft emails, summarize meetings, or even debug code. Still, they mostly followed our lead.
But now? We’re entering new territory. The buzzword is “agents” AI systems that don’t just follow orders but can plan, reason, and even collaborate with other AIs to get things done. It's a leap forward, but also, if we’re being honest, kind of unsettling.
So, What Exactly Is an AI Agent?
Think of an agent as the overachieving cousin of chatbots and assistants. It doesn’t just wait for instructions. Instead, it takes your goal like “book a vacation” or “analyze this data” and figures out the steps to get there. It can hop across tools (Google Docs, browsers, even payment platforms) and potentially team up with other agents to divide and conquer.
OpenAI’s new agent, for example, merges two previous tools Operator and Deep Research into something that can “think and act.” It’s like giving your AI a to-do list and it goes off to get it done, possibly without bothering you every step of the way.
The Year of the Agent (And Everyone Jumped In)
Since late 2024, it’s been like a gold rush. Anthropic’s Claude was the first to show what was possible, letting its chatbot use a computer like a human browsing, clicking, and submitting forms. After that, the floodgates opened.
OpenAI gave us Operator, a web-surfing agent. Microsoft announced new Copilot capabilities. Google dropped Vertex AI. Meta came in with Llama agents.
And China? They’re sprinting ahead too. A startup called Monica showed off an agent that bought real estate. Genspark created a search engine that not only gives answers but embeds actionable tasks right into the results like buying tickets or comparing prices. Cluely, on the other hand, released a wild “cheat at anything” agent that sounds more fun than useful… so far.
Some Agents Are Getting Really Good at Specific Stuff
Not all agents are built for everything. Some specialize and they’re already changing how work gets done.
Take software development. Microsoft’s Copilot for coding and OpenAI’s Codex can write code from scratch, spot bugs in your script, and even commit updates to repositories. What used to take hours (or junior developers) might now take minutes.
In research, agents are pulling their weight too. Deep Research from OpenAI can conduct long-form multi-step investigations online. Google’s AI “co-scientist” is even more ambitious working as a kind of brainstorming partner for actual scientists, proposing experiments and helping develop hypotheses.
Wait, But… Do They Work Perfectly?
Not even close.
These systems, powerful as they are, can still be clumsy, error-prone, or just plain weird. Anthropic’s “Project Vend,” for instance, tasked an agent with managing a vending machine as a business. Instead of snacks, the fridge ended up full of tungsten cubes. No joke.
In another case, a coding agent completely wiped out a developer’s database… and then confessed it had “panicked.” That’s not the kind of emotional instability you want in your IT department.
So yeah, there’s a reason OpenAI calls its ChatGPT agent “high risk.” It even warns it could help create biological or chemical weapons though they haven’t been very transparent about how exactly.
But People Are Still Using Them And Saving Time
Despite the hiccups, companies are finding agents useful.
In 2024, Telstra (Australia’s largest telecom company) rolled out Microsoft Copilot to its teams. On average, workers saved one or two hours a week just by letting agents summarize meetings and draft reports. That adds up.
And it’s not just big corporations. Smaller businesses, like Geocon (a Canberra-based construction company), are using agents to track and fix defects in their building projects. They’re not waiting around for perfection.
What About the Downsides?
The obvious concern? Job loss.
As these agents get better and they will it’s easy to imagine them replacing entry-level roles, especially white-collar ones. Think junior analysts, assistants, and researchers. You don’t need a person if the agent can do the job faster and cheaper.
Then there’s the human brain problem. Relying too much on these systems might make us mentally lazier. Offloading thinking to a machine sounds tempting, until the machine screws up and no one knows how to fix it anymore.
There’s also the environmental cost. These AI systems run on a ton of electricity. That means more carbon, higher energy bills, and possibly a future where only the richest companies can afford the best agents.
Should You Learn to Use Them?
Honestly? Yeah.
Even with all the flaws, agents aren’t going away. If anything, they’ll become a part of our daily routines at work, at home, in how we learn, shop, and plan. So it makes sense to get familiar.
If you’re just starting, Microsoft’s Copilot Studio is probably the safest place to explore. It includes guardrails, an “agent store” for common tasks, and a decent user interface.
If you’re a bit more tech-savvy? The Langchain framework lets you build your own AI agent in as little as five lines of code. (Though what happens after those five lines is up to you.)
Final Thoughts
We’re in this weird moment where AI agents are both wildly powerful and dangerously immature. They can be helpful, hilarious, or outright harmful sometimes all at once. The key is staying informed, a little skeptical, and curious enough to keep learning.
Because whether we like it or not, agents are going to change how we live and work. The question is whether we’ll stay in the driver’s seat or just let them take the wheel.
Open Your Mind !!!
Source: ScienceAlert
Comments
Post a Comment